Non-Importation Agreements Definition
NONIMPORTATION AGREEMENTS were a series of trade restrictions introduced by American settlers to protest british income policy before the American Revolution. The British Stamp Act of 1765 triggered the first non-import agreements. In protest at the unrepresentation tax, New York merchants agreed to a collective embargo on British imports until Parliament lifted stamp duty, and they persuaded traders in Boston and Philadelphia to do the same. Under pressure from British exporters who lost their business, Parliament repealed the Stamp Act within a year. Boston traders and traders have cut their imports of British products by almost half. Unfortunately, the other port cities and the colonies themselves did not adopt the policy of non-importing Boston merchants, which undermined their boycott efforts. This failure of cooperation meant that trade between England and the colonies was sufficient. The British merchants had not felt a threat in this sluggish effort and had not agreed to abandon the Townshend Act. In response to the non-import Boston agreement, Parliament finally struck down the Townshend Revenue Act taxes on all products except tea. The non-import agreements of the years leading up to the American Revolution were an effective tactic to protest British policy and put the Boston Patriots first and demonstrate to other colonies the potential for joint action.
Following the successful boycott that Boston launched in 1768 with the Boston non-Import Agreement, the First Continental Congress of 1774 would pass a colonial ban on all trade with Great Britain. Once again, the settlers were outraged. In response, twelve of the thirteen colonies formed the First Continental Congress, where they drew up a list of complaints against the Crown and the provisions they would make until the legislative power was changed. One of these provisions was the non-consumption agreements, which ensured that the colonies would not import British products and would not export goods to Britain and its colonies if Britain did not rescind its previously adopted laws. Other U.S. cities have implemented similar non-import agreements to oppose the unpopular British policy. The use of raw materials, goods produced in the colonies and Yankee ingenuity were commonplace. Meanwhile, the American colonies experimented with the idea of being self-sufficient and not relying on the metropolis. This experience would be invaluable, because in a few years during the revolution, the British Royal Navy would blockade the American coast and close many major port cities. In the non-import agreement in Boston, traders and traders agreed to boycott goods under the Townshend Revenue Act until taxes on those goods were lifted. Some critical products have been excluded from the boycott, such as salt, hemp and duck cloths. Smuggling was widespread.
This was a direct violation of the Navigation Act. Almost all American communities have benefited or participated in the smuggling of illicit goods purchased by Dutch, French and Spanish traders. Smuggling was not only a cheaper alternative to taxed British products, but it also served as an effective means of resisting and undermining British politics. Boston was overwhelmed by smuggling and smugglers. The Sons of Liberty financed their organization through lucrative smuggling operations. Smuggling financed much of their opposition to British authority. Samuel Adams, John Hancock and Paul Revere were all known as notorious patriotic Boston traffickers. The non-import agreements of the late colonial era were important precursors of the American Revolution. The agreements have stoked tensions that have led to violence. The negotiation of the agreements propelled the Boston Patriots to the forefront and demonstrated to the settlers the potential for unified action.