Drop Dead Agreement

In a March 11, 2019 notice, the Delaware Chancery Court held that a party to a merger agreement had the right to terminate after a drop-dead date, although the non-exercise of its right of continuance was accidental. In bankruptcy proceedings, the drop-dead provisions allow creditors to obtain an exemption from suspension, without further announcement or hearing, by filing an affidavit of non-recovery attesting that the debtor is in arrears in the settlement decision. [In re Lucas, 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 2704 (Bankr. D.S.C. aug. 13, 2007)] Drop-down dates are particularly useful in encouraging contractors to meet the timetable set out in the original agreement. The bidding process for large contracts tends to be played by companies that overestimate their ability to deliver on time and within budget. When the end date arrived and passed and neither party decided to extend it, RAC sent a notice of termination to Vintage – RAC`s board of directors had found that it was “no longer in the company`s interest to proceed under the terms of the merger agreement”. Vintage was “blind” and did not expect RAC to terminate the deal. Vintage then filed a lawsuit, arguing that the parties had effectively extended because they continued to work hard to obtain the FTC`s approval and closure. Vintage also claimed that RAC committed fraud by pretending that they (RAC) were ready to complete the merger, but that they were masking their real intention to terminate immediately after the deadline expired. The decision in this case makes it clear that the Delaware Chancery Court will attempt to comply with the text of an agreement negotiated between two demanding parties, even if one of them makes a forced mistake.

The Court of Justice will not grant a do-over because of an error. Drop Dead Commission is a provision of a contract or court order that allows a party to take action without notice if the other party fails to undertake certain acts. It sets the last date on which an event can take place or, in another way, certain consequences are automatically followed, such as the termination of a contract. B taking possession or introducing a judgment. Drop-down data is usually explicitly stated in the terms of a written agreement, as well as the consequences if it is not respected. The consequences may simply mean the end of the deal, but it`s just as likely that it`s a financial penalty that affects the insulting party`s profit margin for the project. It is also interesting to note that a fall date differs from a peak date. When a party requests a rush in a contract – a delay postponed from the initial plan upwards – it is normally up to them to incentivize to allow the work. This may be an increase in the value of the contract or a separate payment covered by a separate agreement that is made when the project or milestone is delivered before the emergency date. A classic example of an implicit drop-dead date is when the baker tries to deliver a birthday cake one day late. In this scenario, the consequence is also implicit – the angry customer will not pay, so the baker loses materials and time for a cake that he cannot sell.

The plaintiff Vintage Capital Management, LLC (“Vintage”) and the defendant Rent-A-Center, Inc. (“RAC”) had entered into a merger agreement to join Vintage`s investment in the rent-to-own sector – Buddy`s – with RAC. Due to Vintage`s existing investment in Buddy`s, the merger had to be cleared by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for antitrust review. Knowing that the FTC process would be lengthy, Vintage and RAC agreed in the merger agreement on a six-month “end date,” namely a date on which both parties were able to terminate the agreement. . . .

17. September 2021 by
Leave a comment